Daily Hayat – روزنامہ حیات
Daily Hayat
زبان / Languageاردو
Tuesday, September 22, 2026
E-Paper
mumtazkhaksar6@gmail.com
+92 345 8886292
© 2026 Daily Hayat. All rights reserved. Azad Jammu & Kashmir's Premier News Organization.
ADاشتہار / AdvertisementGoogle Ad
HomePakistanImaan Mazari, Hadi Ali Challenge 10-Year Jail Terms in IHC

Imaan Mazari, Hadi Ali Challenge 10-Year Jail Terms in IHCPakistan

hammadkhaksar
By hammadkhaksar
2026-11-07
3 min read

Advocates Imaan Mazari and Hadi Ali Chatha have challenged their 10-year jail sentences in the Islamabad High Court, seeking suspension of the punishment and release on bail.

Imaan Mazari, Hadi Ali Challenge 10-Year Jail Terms in IHC
Share:

The appeals, along with applications seeking suspension of the sentences, were filed on behalf of the two advocates by lawyers Faisal Siddiqui, Riasat Ali Azad and Zainab Janjua, according to Dunya News. The petitions ask the high court to set aside the trial court’s decision and to free the two on bail while the appeals are heard.

According to the report, Mazari and Chatha have challenged the 10-year jail sentences handed down by the trial court in the case, which concerned the removal of barriers. The appeals argue that the trial court failed to fulfil the requirements of a fair trial, and cite judicial precedents in which the transparency of trial proceedings had been questioned.

ADاشتہار / AdvertisementGoogle Ad

The filing is the latest step in a case that has drawn close attention from the legal community, because both appellants are practising advocates. Lawyers’ bodies and bar representatives have followed the proceedings closely, and the high court’s handling of the appeals is expected to be watched just as carefully.

In their appeals, the petitioners have asked the court to examine whether the trial was conducted in accordance with the law and whether the evidence on record supported the convictions. The applications for suspension of sentence argue that the two should be released on bail while the appeals remain pending, a relief that courts commonly consider when an appeal raises arguable questions and the sentence is lengthy.

The Islamabad High Court will now consider the appeals and the applications for suspension of sentence. No date for the first hearing had been announced in the initial reports, and it will be for the court to fix the matter and to decide whether to issue notices to the other side before proceeding further.

Appeals of this kind typically involve a detailed review of the trial record, including the evidence presented, the statements of witnesses and the reasoning of the trial court’s judgment. The appellants’ lawyers will argue that the record does not sustain the convictions, while the prosecution will defend the trial court’s findings.

For now, the filing means the case moves to the appellate stage, where the high court has the power to uphold the convictions, set them aside, order a retrial, or reduce the sentences. The outcome will depend on the court’s assessment of the trial record and the arguments advanced by both sides.

The case will remain in focus as it proceeds through the high court, with the legal community awaiting the court’s first orders on the appeals and the bail applications.